In case of unexpected results, it will be significant to verify the study’s validity and reliability, thus making sure that the data was properly collected, analyzed, and documented. In what ways can the data you have, or that you can potentially collect, challenge your ideas about your topic? To achieve this, it is suggested to maximize trustworthiness and employ a paradigm of realism. How will you successfully defend against validity threats to your conclusions?Įffective defense against validity threats should be based on confirming credibility of the qualitative study. How will you successfully defend against the plausible alternative interpretations?ĭefending measures can involve the use of the argumentation theory, clear definitions of all the alternatives, and paying attention to causal relationships. Dependability concerns can be related to a lack of attention to the changing context Potential threats to validity may include credibility issues, if the study participants would consider the conclusions non-realistic. What are the plausible alternative interpretations and validity threats to your conclusions you might have about your topic?Īmong the plausible alternatives to the interoperation of conclusions, there can be the failure to correctly understand the feelings of players and the assumption that the greater connectedness with other players leads to more psychological disorders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |